|
Post by bborzell on Apr 14, 2010 13:52:36 GMT -5
After waiting all day yesterday for my UMC-1 to be delivered by Fed-Ex only to check the tracking number at 4 pm and discovering that the Fed-Ex contractor (we live in a rural area) blew off my delivery and took it back to the terminal, I called and blasted Fed-Ex for hiring out their responsibilities to irresponsible people and set out to drive to Sacramento to pick it up myself.
This morning I took apart every component interconnect and used the opportunity of inserting the UMC-1 into the system to also check each and every cable, speaker wire, banana plug, amp connection, and power cables. It wasn't pretty back there.
Then I set aside a few hours to hook everything up, run the setup for sources, do the EmoQ and see where I ended up. Here's what's hooked up:
UMC-1 Optoma HD73 Projector Carada 120" Screen B&K 4430 3x200 (Fronts) B&K ST1400 2x 105(Rears/Sides) Emo UPA-2 2x125 (Rears) Rythmic F12 Sub Audiosource AMP 100 (Zone 2) Oppo BDP-83 BD Toshiba HD-A20 HD-DVD Adcom GCD-700 CD Dish VIP622 Energy Pro 22 RefConns for Stereo Energy RC-LCRs Across the Front for HT Emo ERD-1s sides and rear Eight Impedance matching volume controls for Zone 2 Seven sets of various make ceiling speakers One set of HTD Outdoor Speakers
I removed a Rotel RSP-1066 processor and had already replaced a Rotel RDV-1040 DVD player with the OPPO.
Long story short, I was done in about an hour. Ran the setup on the UMC-1, did the EmoQ and that was it. Everything works, there are no snaps, crackles or pops. The UMC-1 does HDMI handshakes cleanly and reliably. I have no problems with the DISH receiver in either Live or Playback mode. I've played BDs, SACDs, CDs, DISH stuff and not even a hiccup. In particular, the 7.1 track of The Golden Compass, while always sounding great, came up a knotch or two with the UMC-1.
As for how it handles signals, both audio and video are a significant improvement over the previous setup. To be fair to the Rotel, I had previously run the video signal from the OPPO and Toshiba directly to the Optoma. I was tempted to do the same and bypass the UMC-1 for video, but had I done so, I would not have appreciated the significant improvement in color. Blacker blacks and skin tones are very impressive. I asked my wife to check out the new setup and she immediately ran the latest episode of Project Runway which we had recorded. The first thing she said was, "Wow, I've never seen Heidi Klum look so natural".
As for audio, this system has never sounded better. Everything is balanced and the sub was tweaked by the EmoQ thing better than I had ever managed with the Radio Shack SPL meter and my ear alone.
I ordered the UMC-1 knowing that the new FW was not out yet. At this point, I will likely wait to update until I see a specific need for it.
Happy camper here. It was well worth the wait and given that my last SS processor cost more that 2X the cost of the UMC-1 and the "replacement" Rotel would be near 3x the cost of the UMC-1, this is a real bargain.
|
|
|
Post by dropzone7 on Apr 14, 2010 14:06:17 GMT -5
Finally some good news today! I'm glad it's working out well for you so far. I too am on the previous firmware so this further supports my decision to leave well enough alone for now.
|
|
|
Post by canadianbacon on Apr 14, 2010 14:07:01 GMT -5
Funny how the "success" stories about the UMC go (generally) without comment.
Congrats. Mine is with FEDEX right now. the more of THESE stories I hear the better I start feeling. I'm really excited to discover what this thing is supposed to be able to do. I hope that I don't find any gremlins in it like some of the other fellas.
|
|
|
Post by ryan08 on Apr 14, 2010 14:10:04 GMT -5
I too am going to wait and see what shakes out here before I update the FW.
|
|
|
Post by Clyde on Apr 14, 2010 14:13:48 GMT -5
I've had my UMC-1 for over a month now and it works perfect for me as well. I don't have a very complicated setup and I tweaked most of the EMO-Q settings to my personal taste. I also plan to hold off on installing the latest firmware.
|
|
ICBM99
Emo VIPs
When will then be now? ...Soon.
Posts: 1,702
|
Post by ICBM99 on Apr 14, 2010 14:18:00 GMT -5
All in all I was fairly happy with v5 of the firmware, other some nagging bits that didn't quite work right. Now v6 while it seems to be better, has caused more issues in my setup, but there are some things I plan on trying in the very near future, to remedy those issues.
|
|
|
Post by subynube on Apr 14, 2010 14:18:58 GMT -5
I just wanted to say that I installed the new firmware yesterday without a hitch. Very easy. I have a very simple set up, and I don't use it for any video performance, and no HDMI. It works very well for me, the new sub XO slider works now (didnt before the new FW) and the speaker level settings are saved (also wasnt before the new FW). So it works fine for me. I have heard of problems of the bass and treble not working on peoples set ups. I don't know if that is the case on mine yet or not, because I havent tried it and don't need it. However, I would like it to work if needed in the future. All in all, the new FW was definately a positive step up for me. I hope more go as well as mine.
|
|
|
Post by aboroth00 on Apr 14, 2010 14:30:14 GMT -5
Great news. I was just about ready to upgrade my UMC as soon as I got home but the new reports have given me pause. however, the only major concern I have with the previous firmware version were the Sub eqs and the crossovers.
Are the crossovers working for you? I hadn't notice the problem originally but over time i realized my bass was bloated.
|
|
tknice
Sensei
Movies!
Posts: 358
|
Post by tknice on Apr 14, 2010 14:37:48 GMT -5
so what's the difference between you and these other people with problems? Seems like a pop or crackle or blowing a speaker by switching DPSs wouldn't be user error.
Hmmm.
|
|
|
Post by moodyman on Apr 14, 2010 14:38:21 GMT -5
Everything is balanced and the sub was tweaked by the EmoQ thing better than I had ever managed with the Radio Shack SPL meter and my ear alone. The UMC does automatic subwoofer EQ???
|
|
|
Post by darien87 on Apr 14, 2010 14:40:54 GMT -5
Happy camper here. It was well worth the wait and given that my last SS processor cost more that 2X the cost of the UMC-1 and the "replacement" Rotel would be near 3x the cost of the UMC-1, this is a real bargain. "Mine works great. No problems here." Screw you too. JK But it is frustrating to have issues and then have someone else come along all chipper.
|
|
|
Post by bborzell on Apr 14, 2010 14:47:40 GMT -5
so what's the difference between you and these other people with problems? Seems like a pop or crackle or blowing a speaker by switching DPSs wouldn't be user error. Hmmm. I guess you might think I am lying or am simply an Emo plant. I don't know what the difference is between me and others who are having trouble. But to suggest that there is something wrong with a report on no problems might say more about the suggester than the person having no problems.
|
|
|
Post by sbavnut on Apr 14, 2010 14:50:46 GMT -5
Which brings us to another issue... Is it better to release SPECIFIC fixes (several of them) or release ONE big fix? ?? With Emo, it seems like the "ONE big fix" is not working. Many things are getting fixed, BUT things that used to work before are breaking with the new firmware. On the other hand, some people are happy with v5 of the firmware. Why can't they get a patch that fixes the "retain channel level on shut down" issue. As far as EmoQ is concerned, everyone will be better off if Dan/Lonnie can make the EmoQ a two-step process - Step 1. Set Speaker x-over and distance setting - including manual overrides. Save the settings. Step 2. Use the saved x-over and distance setting and then apply EQ to correct nodes and troughs.
|
|
|
Post by bborzell on Apr 14, 2010 14:51:32 GMT -5
Happy camper here. It was well worth the wait and given that my last SS processor cost more that 2X the cost of the UMC-1 and the "replacement" Rotel would be near 3x the cost of the UMC-1, this is a real bargain. "Mine works great. No problems here." Screw you too. JK But it is frustrating to have issues and then have someone else come along all chipper. Sorry that I can't share your disappointment with your UMC-1 nor your attitude toward people who have the same right to report their experiences as do you.
|
|
|
Post by bborzell on Apr 14, 2010 14:55:05 GMT -5
Everything is balanced and the sub was tweaked by the EmoQ thing better than I had ever managed with the Radio Shack SPL meter and my ear alone. The UMC does automatic subwoofer EQ??? I don't know the answer to that. I was referring to level setting. Now I am interested in going back and looking at the results report in greater detail. I was simply satisfied with what I was hearing.
|
|
|
Post by robfive on Apr 14, 2010 15:00:51 GMT -5
so what's the difference between you and these other people with problems? Seems like a pop or crackle or blowing a speaker by switching DPSs wouldn't be user error. Hmmm. The difference is that he hasn't updated the firmware to v6 and perhaps has not tried the different DSP settings. I know I would not have found out about the EXTREMELY high level DSP had I not been messing around with settings last night. Before yesterday I had never touched those settings thus never knowing if they really worked or not. I am glad the UMC-1 is working for some people, whether it is v5 or 6 of the firmware. Not all the issues will be noticed by everyone. For example I do not have cable or sat so I never get audio drop outs during playback nor do I have a desire to run an auto EQ system so I didn't notice any problems with EMO-Q. I do have two DVI displays so the frequent "loss of sink" message and changes in resolution were bothersome to me and hopefully v6 has improved this (I think it has). I am sure there are many more people who are completely satisfied with their UMC-1 performance and just not reporting it here.
|
|
|
Post by kumayama on Apr 14, 2010 15:09:00 GMT -5
so what's the difference between you and these other people with problems? Seems like a pop or crackle or blowing a speaker by switching DPSs wouldn't be user error. Hmmm. I am sure there are many more people who are completely satisfied with their UMC-1 performance and just not reporting it here. On the other hand, quite likely there are many others who are experiencing serious problems, but don't feel the need to report it when others have already described the issue, or simply don't post because they don't want to deal with the potential responses.
|
|
|
Post by monkumonku on Apr 14, 2010 15:14:45 GMT -5
I am sure there are many more people who are completely satisfied with their UMC-1 performance and just not reporting it here. On the other hand, quite likely there are many others who are experiencing serious problems, but don't feel the need to report it when others have already described the issue, or simply don't post because they don't want to deal with the potential responses. Based on the variety of responses I think Emo should rename this model to YMMV-1. ;D
|
|
ICBM99
Emo VIPs
When will then be now? ...Soon.
Posts: 1,702
|
Post by ICBM99 on Apr 14, 2010 15:31:26 GMT -5
^ LOL
+1
|
|
|
Post by powerwindow on Apr 14, 2010 15:36:30 GMT -5
.... I am glad the UMC-1 is working for some people, whether it is v5 or 6 of the firmware. Not all the issues will be noticed by everyone. For example I do not have cable or sat so I never get audio drop outs during playback nor do I have a desire to run an auto EQ system so I didn't notice any problems with EMO-Q. I do have two DVI displays so the frequent "loss of sink" message and changes in resolution were bothersome to me and hopefully v6 has improved this (I think it has). I am sure there are many more people who are completely satisfied with their UMC-1 performance and just not reporting it here. I'm still waiting for my preoder to come up, but obviously am folowing the UMC status closely. I'm curious whether you are running a DVD/CD player digitally (HDMI, coax, optical) to the UMC? Seems as if there have been reports of audio dropouts on CD playback at the begining of songs. I suppose of you are running RCA's to the UMC's 7.1 inputs you wouldn't experience the dropouts as the Cirrus chip is out of the loop. Just wondering? Sips
|
|