klinemj
Emo VIPs 
Honorary Emofest Scribe
Posts: 14,742
|
Post by klinemj on Apr 20, 2016 16:54:53 GMT -5
Thanks. I figured it was with it having EmoQ. I am surprised it is not TI based, but hey...Cirrus is fine. Mark |
|
|
|
Post by bolle on Apr 21, 2016 3:39:44 GMT -5
The CL platform is proven and stable - and imho great for a $599 processor.
So obviously the Emersa EMP-1 will be TI based. PLEASE also allow a Dirac full upgrade for the EMP-1 Keith!
|
|
|
|
Post by jonas79 on Apr 21, 2016 8:12:50 GMT -5
Sorry, I don't have that information yet. There will, of course, be a lot more information as we get closer to launch date. Will a full version of Dirac be offered for the Emersa processor? If Emersa processor come with a upgrade to full dirac and HDMI 2.0B Board and HDCP 2.2 i promise this will be a very popular product. I have buyed it direct. Is this possible Keith ?? |
|
KeithL
Administrator 
Posts: 9,929
|
Post by KeithL on Apr 21, 2016 8:59:21 GMT -5
Whether you can still buy direct or have to go through a dealer depends on where you are - and may change. For a definitive answer there I would call in and talk to someone in Sales. Sorry, I don't have that information yet. There will, of course, be a lot more information as we get closer to launch date. If Emersa processor come with a upgrade to full dirac and HDMI 2.0B Board and HDCP 2.2 i promise this will be a very popular product. I have buyed it direct. Is this possible Keith ?? |
|
|
|
Post by neo20013 on Apr 21, 2016 11:10:57 GMT -5
So obviously the Emersa EMP-1 will be TI based. PLEASE also allow a Dirac full upgrade for the EMP-1 Keith! It would also be interesting to know, if this possibility for adding 2 Atmos channels on the XMC-1 goes forward, if the Emersa EMP-1, as is based on the same TI platform as the XMC-1, would be able to have the same 2 Atmos channels. If so, and if cost can be maintained under 1000$, it would be an unbeatable deal ... |
|
|
|
Post by rbk123 on Apr 21, 2016 11:51:38 GMT -5
Lets have that lift-off!   |
|
|
|
Post by HTfanHungary on Apr 21, 2016 12:30:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bolle on Apr 21, 2016 13:19:52 GMT -5
Let´s Keep it realistic. For me 7.1 and Dirac full would be already a very good deal with the EMP-1. No interest in Atmos from my side - but that´s just me.
|
|
|
|
Post by brubacca on Apr 21, 2016 13:26:11 GMT -5
Only do 3.1 in my house. Forget Atmos on the EMP-1 and BaseX for me. Don't need or want it.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigen27 on Apr 21, 2016 15:42:25 GMT -5
Hey guy's will ether the basX or emersa ever go to a 7.2 set up? I know I can run a spliter but I was just curious if it would ever be offered.
|
|
Lsc
Emo VIPs
Posts: 3,342
|
Post by Lsc on Apr 21, 2016 15:55:41 GMT -5
Hey guy's will ether the basX or emersa ever go to a 7.2 set up? I know I can run a spliter but I was just curious if it would ever be offered. Emersa is 7.1 and so is Bas-X. I doubt this architecture will change. |
|
|
|
Post by wizardofoz on Apr 21, 2016 22:17:14 GMT -5
use a miniDSP 2x4 on the output for multiple subs maybe at least can tune them individually ... tale outputs from mix/LR outs even for a full 2 sep subs
|
|
|
|
Post by bolle on Apr 22, 2016 1:37:17 GMT -5
use a miniDSP 2x4 on the output for multiple subs maybe at least can tune them individually ... tale outputs from mix/LR outs even for a full 2 sep subs If I understand you correctly this would only work for Stereo since otherwise you would miss the LFE-channel. In most cases, one channel of EQ for the sum of your Subs is enough. I personally have a SBA with 4 Subs and don´t have any Problems with the .1 channel from the UMC. |
|
|
|
Post by wizardofoz on Apr 22, 2016 1:58:46 GMT -5
of course depends on what you are trying to achieve
|
|
|
|
Post by mdanderson on Apr 22, 2016 17:05:27 GMT -5
Will there be an Emersa edr-5 channel power amp and what will be the price and rated power? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by creimes on Apr 23, 2016 0:39:46 GMT -5
Will there be an Emersa edr-5 channel power amp and what will be the price and rated power? Thanks. Emersa Amp (three models). Like the EPA-1 and EPI-1, Emersa Amps share are designed with the same slim, elegant 1RU chassis, and lightweight, ultra-efficient ICEpower Class-D power amplification found throughout the line. Individually they are: Emersa EDA-2 (MSRP: $599): 2 channels; 150 watts/channel into 8 ohms. Emersa EDA-5 (MSRP: $799): 5 channels; 125 watts/channel into 8 ohms. Emersa EDA-7 (MSRP: $999): 7 channels; 125 watts/channel into 8 ohms. |
|
|
|
Post by peacock on Apr 23, 2016 2:23:40 GMT -5
Emersa amps have a identity problem if you ask me. sure they are lighter etc, but overlaps with basX at a higher price. ice modules are not hard to come by online either.
there have been a few products like that in the past where the buyer gets confused by the offerings.
instead they could have been marketed for active crossover setups, 2 and 4 modules (for each speaker) in as compact form as possible.. for stereo 2way and stereo 4way setups. that would make some sense given how much traction DSPs like minidsp are getting these days.
|
|
|
|
Post by repeetavx on Apr 23, 2016 10:29:56 GMT -5
Emersa amps have a identity problem if you ask me. sure they are lighter etc, but overlaps with basX at a higher price. ice modules are not hard to come by online either. You're right. This should be interesting. BasX A-300 Stereo amp, 150 watts @8 ohms $399 Emersa EDA-2 Stereo amp, 150 watts @8 ohms $599 Knowing Emotiva, they will build both amps with the lowest distortion, and highest transparency possible. My guess would be that side by side, they would be all but impossible to tell apart, sound wise. Though that is a comparison that I'm looking forward to hearing about. So I guess that you would be paying fifty percent more for weight and heat savings. |
|
|
|
Post by pedrocols on Apr 23, 2016 10:54:41 GMT -5
How many different amps do people need? Really. Especially if they all going to potentially sound the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 23, 2016 11:10:01 GMT -5
How many different amps do people need? Really. Especially if they all going to potentially sound the same. 42? |
|
