|
Post by porkloindubois on Mar 2, 2015 18:34:00 GMT -5
I have an XDA-1. It seems to have been settled that the volume control on it is digital, meaning there's a loss of material as the volume is turned down. I've also read that the XDA2 corrected that with a truly analog volume control, I have yet to test this with an outside preamplifier to hear it with my own ears as I've learned so much of what I read is theoretical delivered as useable information. If it turns out that the information loss is noticeable when the volume is turned below 80 on the XDA1, my choices become buying an XDA-2 or a preamp to insert between the XDA-1 and the XPA-200. Which brings up the question: Does the preamp in the XDA-2 qualify as "active" or "passive" ? Fans of "passive" preamplifiers make the compelling argument that they inject less color into the source material than their active counterparts and it would be a point in favor of an XDA-2. I tend to (rationally or irrationally) prefer simplicity, which is why it will hold weight in my decision.
|
|
klinemj
Emo VIPs
Official Emofest Scribe
Posts: 15,094
|
Post by klinemj on Mar 2, 2015 20:59:40 GMT -5
The DC-1 is yet another option. And, from what I understand, I believe you could call the xda-2 or dc-1 a passive preamp. Most call them "awesome DAC's"
Mark
|
|
|
Post by garbulky on Mar 2, 2015 21:08:46 GMT -5
Technically it's an active pre-amp I think. If you are wanting to buy an XDA-2 because of the lossy volume control of the XDA-1, that's not the way I'd go FWIW. The XDA-2 has a slightly better neutral reproduction in the higher frequencies - reducing glare, but falls short of being an overall upgrade. In my experience, the DC-1, does a lot better (That's where I would look towards). I own both XDA-1 and DC-1, and have had extensive experience with the XDA-2 in my room.
|
|
|
Post by audiobill on Mar 3, 2015 5:47:45 GMT -5
I agree it's an active preamp; it uses opamps IIRC.
Go with the DC-1, a much better unit.
|
|
klinemj
Emo VIPs
Official Emofest Scribe
Posts: 15,094
|
Post by klinemj on Mar 3, 2015 6:06:39 GMT -5
Ah yes...forgot it did. Anyway, to the OP...try the sound of the DC-1.
You get a 30 day return.
Mark
|
|
|
Post by vcautokid on Mar 3, 2015 7:19:38 GMT -5
Yep, the DC-1 tracks with better precision with it's quality ladder conversion volume control, and as clear, and open sound as you can get. More so than the already very good XDA-2. The DC-1 is amazing.
|
|
|
Post by vcautokid on Mar 3, 2015 10:24:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by porkloindubois on Mar 3, 2015 19:47:11 GMT -5
Thanks. More to look at and drool over.
|
|
klinemj
Emo VIPs
Official Emofest Scribe
Posts: 15,094
|
Post by klinemj on Mar 3, 2015 20:56:48 GMT -5
If you get a DC-1, I think you will drool over the sound. I am still so impressed with mine after having it since they were first released. That you can feed it an RCA source and pass that through is a real bonus for those who need that.
Mark
|
|
|
Post by porkloindubois on Mar 5, 2015 1:15:04 GMT -5
Well, apparently the jury is not totally out on the volume control on the XDA-1 being "lossy". It may very well be on paper, but some buddies and I did a bit of blind A/B'ing with the XDA-1, two different preamps and a couple of nice pairs of speakers. The XDA-1 routed directly to the power amp with it's volume control lower than 80 was consistently chosen over the XDA-1 with it's volume turned up to 80 and routed through a preamplifier set at comparable volume levels. Chock one up for the minimalists out there. It's going to be nice to sit back and enjoy some music with THAT nagging doubt removed from the back of my brain.
|
|
|
Post by cheapthryl on Mar 5, 2015 7:47:37 GMT -5
I am still enjoying a xda-1 after years of use. You could put a control freak in the mix for passive volume control.
|
|