|
|
Post by geebo on Nov 20, 2024 12:54:19 GMT -5
Since seeing a video (which I can't seem to find) where a guy spent days trying various Dirac measurement patterns until he found one that seemed to be best for a single listener ... I've been using this "Six-Pack" or "Domino" pattern ... roughly depicted here ... View AttachmentAll the measurements are on the same plane 8" apart, with the critical MLP measurement #1 in the middle of the rear row. It works great! So after watching the video someone posted recently where Theo from Audioholics goes through measurement patterns for Dirac, Audyssey and ARC ... and after recently watching some videos with Carl Tatz who designs mixing rooms with his "Phantom Center" method ... I got to thinking that maybe I'd try doing some high and low measurements along with measuring the MLP a little more behind my actual ears. Tatz puts the focal point of his room timing 20" behind the MLP. I wasn't going to go to that extreme and it really doesn't work with multichannel unless you have individual control of each speaker's distance, which we don't with Dirac. So okay I tried to do a multiple exposure to show this new pattern relative to my actual ears... black cap in place so as not to glare off my old bald head  View AttachmentI recline the couch all the way when I measure, and pile on a blanket to absorb close reflections from the leather. So you see the MLP measurement is maybe a foot behind where my ears are when I adjust the couch for actual listening. Then I went two high in the rear on either side. Then 8" forward with two low L/R, and the center higher than the MLP was. I'm listening now. A lot of stuff sounds really great and that could be that Dirac 3.11 is doing something new too. The imaging and soundstage is different and in many cases especially Atmos and 5.1 music it really seems to be better. Feels more forward and three dimensional. I feel like some stereo tracks sound different aside from imaging and soundstage. Have to listen some more and give it time. p.s. Easier to imagine taking 7 photos and blending them in Photoshop, than it turned out to be. But I hope you get the idea from this composite. I don't sit in the seat when I measure. How is the center phantom image with stereo material? |
|
|
|
Post by marcl on Nov 20, 2024 13:08:51 GMT -5
Since seeing a video (which I can't seem to find) where a guy spent days trying various Dirac measurement patterns until he found one that seemed to be best for a single listener ... I've been using this "Six-Pack" or "Domino" pattern ... roughly depicted here ... View AttachmentAll the measurements are on the same plane 8" apart, with the critical MLP measurement #1 in the middle of the rear row. It works great! So after watching the video someone posted recently where Theo from Audioholics goes through measurement patterns for Dirac, Audyssey and ARC ... and after recently watching some videos with Carl Tatz who designs mixing rooms with his "Phantom Center" method ... I got to thinking that maybe I'd try doing some high and low measurements along with measuring the MLP a little more behind my actual ears. Tatz puts the focal point of his room timing 20" behind the MLP. I wasn't going to go to that extreme and it really doesn't work with multichannel unless you have individual control of each speaker's distance, which we don't with Dirac. So okay I tried to do a multiple exposure to show this new pattern relative to my actual ears... black cap in place so as not to glare off my old bald head View AttachmentI recline the couch all the way when I measure, and pile on a blanket to absorb close reflections from the leather. So you see the MLP measurement is maybe a foot behind where my ears are when I adjust the couch for actual listening. Then I went two high in the rear on either side. Then 8" forward with two low L/R, and the center higher than the MLP was. I'm listening now. A lot of stuff sounds really great and that could be that Dirac 3.11 is doing something new too. The imaging and soundstage is different and in many cases especially Atmos and 5.1 music it really seems to be better. Feels more forward and three dimensional. I feel like some stereo tracks sound different aside from imaging and soundstage. Have to listen some more and give it time. p.s. Easier to imagine taking 7 photos and blending them in Photoshop, than it turned out to be. But I hope you get the idea from this composite. I don't sit in the seat when I measure. How is the center phantom image with stereo material? I have to listen to more things. It has always been good, but it may be a little lower and more forward. |
|
|
|
Post by geebo on Nov 20, 2024 13:21:40 GMT -5
How is the center phantom image with stereo material? I have to listen to more things. It has always been good, but it may be a little lower and more forward. Looking forward to what to think. I've been using the pattern you discussed previously and imaging has never been better for me with Dirac. |
|
ttocs
Global Moderator 
I always have a wonderful time, wherever I am, whomever I'm with. (Elwood P Dowd)
Posts: 8,154
|
Post by ttocs on Nov 20, 2024 13:47:33 GMT -5
So okay I tried to do a multiple exposure to show this new pattern relative to my actual ears... black cap in place so as not to glare off my old bald head Where is M. C. Escher when you need him? |
|
|
|
Post by marcl on Nov 20, 2024 14:42:10 GMT -5
I have to listen to more things. It has always been good, but it may be a little lower and more forward. Looking forward to what to think. I've been using the pattern you discussed previously and imaging has never been better for me with Dirac. Okay I just spent an hour or so listening and it is really good! Dominique Fils-Aime Nameless album ... first track I was startled by a woman singing quietly five feet in front of me! Then each other voice was in its place. And the next track, The Birds, was rock solid with the main vocal in the middle and other sounds distributed evenly. I do have a sense that the center image is lower, more eye level that it was, and that's a good thing. Not Our First Goat Rodeo with Yo Yo Ma, Stuart Duncan, Chris Thiele and Edgar Meyer ... The Trappings ... each voice in its place left-center, center, right center and Edgar's bass anchored right below with no boom, just depth and plenty of "pluck". One of my 5.1 benchmarks, Engegard Quartet Haydn Op. 76 No. 5 recorded by Morten Lindberg of 2L ... the instruments are just wider than stereo with the cello closer than the right speaker and viola closer than the left. Perfect. As I've listened to several familiar tracks past couple days i find myself hearing quiet instruments I haven't noticed before .... a bit of percussion or a guitar. So the two variables here are new measurement pattern and Dirac 3.11. I think both are worth a try. I'd like to hear if anyone else feels a difference. |
|
|
|
Post by geebo on Nov 20, 2024 17:56:00 GMT -5
Looking forward to what to think. I've been using the pattern you discussed previously and imaging has never been better for me with Dirac. Okay I just spent an hour or so listening and it is really good! Dominique Fils-Aime Nameless album ... first track I was startled by a woman singing quietly five feet in front of me! Then each other voice was in its place. And the next track, The Birds, was rock solid with the main vocal in the middle and other sounds distributed evenly. I do have a sense that the center image is lower, more eye level that it was, and that's a good thing. Not Our First Goat Rodeo with Yo Yo Ma, Stuart Duncan, Chris Thiele and Edgar Meyer ... The Trappings ... each voice in its place left-center, center, right center and Edgar's bass anchored right below with no boom, just depth and plenty of "pluck". One of my 5.1 benchmarks, Engegard Quartet Haydn Op. 76 No. 5 recorded by Morten Lindberg of 2L ... the instruments are just wider than stereo with the cello closer than the right speaker and viola closer than the left. Perfect. As I've listened to several familiar tracks past couple days i find myself hearing quiet instruments I haven't noticed before .... a bit of percussion or a guitar. So the two variables here are new measurement pattern and Dirac 3.11. I think both are worth a try. I'd like to hear if anyone else feels a difference. Sounds promising. My next Dirac run will be with this method. As for 3.11, I had an issue with a UMIK-2 where any "corrected" trace tailed off from the target by 3dB starting around 40Hz. I tried all kinds of things but no matter what I set the target to the corrected traced dropped from that target by 3dB at the low end. I reinstalled 3.10 and it no longer exhibited that behavior. The UMIK-1 wasn't affected. edit: After using the Dirac maintenance tool to uninstall 3.10 I redownloaded and installed 3.11 again and it no longer has the target/corrected trace issue I was seeing. |
|
|
|
Post by marcl on Nov 21, 2024 10:04:25 GMT -5
I really like Chris' site and articles. I think we're of the same mind fundamentally, though we might express our ideas differently ... and I do not spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on my solutions. But I would love to hear his megabuck 7.1.4 all Wilson system someday! I think this is interesting. Yes, it's long-ish. It makes some critically important and indisputable points. audiophilestyle.com/ca/bits-and-bytes/why-dont-you-use-digital-room-correction-a-follow-up-opportunity-r1312/ p.s. don't listen to the audio ... it's not Chris, it's a bot and takes half hour. p.p.s. Chris bends over backward to be diplomatic in this article ... taking meticulous care to avoid what I think is the "elephant in the room" of this topic ... well two elephants: one is that the science of small room acoustics says the elephant IS the room; the other is that the main reason people actually reject DRC is that they personally (at least on this topic) prefer to reject the science in favor of perception. p.x3s. a serendipitous consequence of following Chris' posts was that back in May I responded to an article about the BACCH-SP written by Joe Whip ... who happens to live near me ... and so I invited him to hear my system (which he has yet to) ... but he called me one day and we talked an hour and he invited me to join Philadelphia Area Audio Group! I leapt! And have been to all but one monthly gathering since May and it is absolutely the best experience I could have imagined for my current state of audiophelia in retirement. |
|
ttocs
Global Moderator
I always have a wonderful time, wherever I am, whomever I'm with. (Elwood P Dowd)
Posts: 8,154
|
Post by ttocs on Nov 22, 2024 12:44:54 GMT -5
Dirac v3.11.0
In this version the Mic Gain slider is now setup much better than ever before. It now reports Gain in a proper format, from -20dB, to 0.0dB, to +30dB. No longer does it employ a percentage scale morphing into a dB scale, which I know confused many with whom I've communicated.
This new scale had me wondering if Dirac had changed the gain structure utilized in the +dB portion of the scale from being purely digital to analog. The answer from Dirac is No. Any amount of positive gain is digital.
Knowing this is important to guide those of us who have microphones with the USB-C connection port. USB-A mics all operate just fine with Dirac, but USB-C mics can be misrepresented by Dirac as having no gain.
A UMIK-1 mic with a USB-C connection port will need to use the digital mic gain in Dirac for those systems that experience Low Signal To Noise errors often.
But the UMIK-2 mic has an app called miniDSP-MIK that is specifically for changing the mic gain - and this is really important - using ANALOG GAIN, not digital. Setting the gain at 32dB is the magic number to make Dirac measure as if it's a 18dB gain microphone, which it is but Dirac doesn't see it that way.
This version of Dirac is an improvement, not a fix. There's still an issue with USB-C mics not being recognized as having the gain setting they do. I believe the issue is a design flaw by miniDSP because it's not just Dirac that doesn't see the mic correctly, it's also operating systems. But miniDSP says it's Dirac's fault, and Dirac says go talk to miniDSP. I've talked to both companies multiple times and got nowhere. So I now use a Earthworks mics and really good audio interfaces and am extremely happy!
|
|
|
|
Post by geebo on Nov 22, 2024 13:00:26 GMT -5
Dirac v3.11.0 In this version the Mic Gain slider is now setup much better than ever before. It now reports Gain in a proper format, from -20dB, to 0.0dB, to +30dB. No longer does it employ a percentage scale morphing into a dB scale, which I know confused many with whom I've communicated. This new scale had me wondering if Dirac had changed the gain structure utilized in the +dB portion of the scale from being purely digital to analog. The answer from Dirac is No. Any amount of positive gain is digital. Knowing this is important to guide those of us who have microphones with the USB-C connection port. USB-A mics all operate just fine with Dirac, but USB-C mics can be misrepresented by Dirac as having no gain. A UMIK-1 mic with a USB-C connection port will need to use the digital mic gain in Dirac for those systems that experience Low Signal To Noise errors often. But the UMIK-2 mic has an app called miniDSP-MIK that is specifically for changing the mic gain - and this is really important - using ANALOG GAIN, not digital. Setting the gain at 32dB is the magic number to make Dirac measure as if it's a 18dB gain microphone, which it is but Dirac doesn't see it that way. This version of Dirac is an improvement, not a fix. There's still an issue with USB-C mics not being recognized as having the gain setting they do. I believe the issue is a design flaw by miniDSP because it's not just Dirac that doesn't see the mic correctly, it's also operating systems. But miniDSP says it's Dirac's fault, and Dirac says go talk to miniDSP. I've talked to both companies multiple times and got nowhere. So I now use a Earthworks mics and really good audio interfaces and am extremely happy! +1 I just got a UMIK-2 and noticed the levels were really low in Dirac. At the suggestion of ttocs I got the gain adjustment app from miniDSP (you have to request it through miniDSP support) and set the gain to 32. The levels in Dirac are now very similar to those of the UMIK-1 and the end result with Dirac has been very good. |
|
|
|
Post by merlinwerks on Nov 23, 2024 18:22:26 GMT -5
So the only recourse for those of us with a Umik-1/USBc and 3.11 is to use digital mic gain? I just updated Dirac to 3.11 from a somewhat older version and my levels are in the mud. It was fine with the older version. I can restore to the older version though.
|
|
|
|
Post by geebo on Nov 23, 2024 19:54:46 GMT -5
So the only recourse for those of us with a Umik-1/USBc and 3.11 is to use digital mic gain? I just updated Dirac to 3.11 from a somewhat older version and my levels are in the mud. It was fine with the older version. I can restore to the older version though. You could always take the UMIK-1 apart and change the internal gain with the dip switches inside. |
|
|
|
Post by merlinwerks on Nov 23, 2024 20:04:32 GMT -5
Thanks will probably end up doing that.
FWIW, I installed 3.10 and gains/levels are back to where they were previously.
Do we have enough experience with 3.11 to know if it offers any significant improvements over 3.10?
|
|
lgjr
Minor Hero
Posts: 60
|
Post by lgjr on Nov 24, 2024 6:34:01 GMT -5
I got an email from Minidsp saying the app would now be available on the downloads page. I don't see it. Unless it's under a different name.
|
|
