Pauly
Emo VIPs
Posts: 5,237
|
Post by Pauly on Feb 12, 2010 2:06:51 GMT -5
You just want to slap that guy every time you see him. What a little rat.
|
|
Pauly
Emo VIPs
Posts: 5,237
|
Post by Pauly on Feb 12, 2010 2:08:42 GMT -5
I've heard my buddies Maggies on the DMR, and it did just fine with those power suckers.
|
|
|
Post by bigred7078 on Feb 12, 2010 2:12:00 GMT -5
You just want to slap that guy every time you see him. What a little rat. This is his mug shot after he beat a hooker who bit his tongue ;D
|
|
Pauly
Emo VIPs
Posts: 5,237
|
Post by Pauly on Feb 12, 2010 2:23:01 GMT -5
Too funny.
|
|
|
Post by placebo473 on Feb 15, 2010 13:56:22 GMT -5
Pauly, those Ascend CMT-340SEs will be hard to beat in regards to sound projection, HT usage, and clarity with four LFM-1s(!). The ERM-6.2s and the CMT-340SEs are $620 and $598 respectfully: not sure if one would say there's a difference in value there. I see these two models as a lateral move. I would love to hear owners to chime in unbiased-ly on the performance of the ERM-6.2 as a center channel. A great center channel is priceless. Practicality with placement and/or mounting comes into play when you consider the 6.3s. The Sierra is an intriguing option. This speaker promises to offer a higher level of sound quality over both the 340SEs and 6.2s, although some of the improved SQ comes from the Sierra's bass reproduction (not necessarily needed in your case). I think everyone is waiting for a detailed comparison review of the 6.2s vs the 340SEs. If you're looking for 'more' than what your killer system already provides, it may be a waste of time demo-ing the 6.2s. Try using the 6.3s as your LCRs.
|
|
|
Post by bigred7078 on Feb 15, 2010 14:00:21 GMT -5
If you're looking for 'more' than what your killer system already provides, it may be a waste of time demo-ing the 6.2s. Try using the 6.3s as your LCRs. Actually, a lot of people prefer the 6.2 in a 2-channel setup. They were the big hit of Emofest. But I liked the 6.3's
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2010 17:37:43 GMT -5
But I liked the 6.3's I bet you like biscuits and mustard too . . . ;D
|
|
|
Post by bigred7078 on Feb 15, 2010 17:38:45 GMT -5
But I liked the 6.3's I bet you like biscuits and mustard too . . . ;D well...not together, but separately they are excellent ;D
|
|
ntrain42
Emo VIPs
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be home before breakfast!
Posts: 2,969
|
Post by ntrain42 on Feb 15, 2010 18:05:00 GMT -5
Hey guys, I've been asking questions about this on another thread, so I figured I'd start my own. I've previously mentioned that I'm building a dedicated two channel system in another room and need new HT speakers. Most of my money will be going to the two channel rig, so I figured I'd go for the biggest bang for the buck for my new HT speakers. I'm already running an Ascend 340se center channel, which I really like. So I recently paid for the matching 340se mains, and the 170se's for surrounds. For 888 bucks for those three, I think it will turn out to be a screaming deal. My question is this. Do you think I could do any better than this in the $2,500-$3,000 range? I don't mind spending the extra dough, if it means getting a big step up from the Ascend system. I've considered the B&W 600 series, the similarly priced PSB system, Axiom, AV123, SVS, and many others. I'm sure I can get better looking speakers for more, but the sound is all I care about. So, are there any systems out there that can give me a big performance bump from the Ascends for around 2,500-3,000 bucks for a 5.0 system? If your already happy with your Ascend center channel and like the sound, Id keep it and follow up with more gear from that company. We all have opinions on speakers and sound taste preferences, but noone here is going to be able to tell you anything better than what your ears already know when it comes to speaker voicing.
|
|
Pauly
Emo VIPs
Posts: 5,237
|
Post by Pauly on Feb 15, 2010 18:15:08 GMT -5
Well, I've been pretty set on the Sierra's for about a week now, but I can't help but wonder if the 340se's would be a little better for HT. The Sierra is a better overall speaker, but it just seems like the 340 might have more impact and be able to play a bit louder. But, the HT will also be used for SACD/DVD-A as well. So the Sierra's will be better for that. It looks like I might not be able to order multiple sets of speakers at one time to A/B. But I do plan on ordering one at a time, and sending them back to order another set from a different company. I think I'll order the Emo's first (6.3 L, C, R). Then the 340se's, then the Sierra's. Maybe the Emo 6.2 LCR too, just to make sure. So it'll be a good 3 or 4 months worth of testing. Since I'm not doing a direct A/B comparison, I'll keep detailed notes on each setup, and then compare the likes and dislikes in the end. I think this is the best way for me to get the right set, since I probably won't be able to order them at the same time. I'll keep you posted in the next few months. Thanks for all the help fellas.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2010 7:28:03 GMT -5
I bet you like biscuits and mustard too . . . ;D well...not together, but separately they are excellent ;D I like French Fries
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis.ie on Feb 17, 2010 7:44:47 GMT -5
So we agree then, right? They do have an advantage. That sort of contradicts what you said above. Looks like we are on the same wavelength here about Emo speakers being a better value than their price would indicate. I agree that Emo speaker could be better, but not at this price! That is my point. I don't think you can find a better sounding speaker, for example, than the ERM-6.2 at $299. Yes, I know there will be always be some who prefer another speaker but I would put my next social security check on it that the large majority would agree with me. ;D I'm right with you on that one.. I LOVE my 6.2's. With a subwoofer they sound very natural and balanced. The only thing I wish they had was a piano black finish. Looks-wise they could do better but sound-wise, they are really nice. I was listening to Hiromi Uehara ("Place to Be"), Pat Metheny ("Orchestrion") and Eva Cassidy ("LIve at Blues Alley") on them today and all I can say is I'm happy I have the 6.2's. Is this with the upgraded crossovers though? EDIT: From the post date I think it might have been before the upgrade?
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis.ie on Feb 17, 2010 7:47:58 GMT -5
But I liked the 6.3's I bet you like biscuits and mustard too . . . ;D I do - and the 6.3s.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2010 8:39:23 GMT -5
Well, I've been pretty set on the Sierra's for about a week now, but I can't help but wonder if the 340se's would be a little better for HT. The Sierra is a better overall speaker, but it just seems like the 340 might have more impact and be able to play a bit louder. But, the HT will also be used for SACD/DVD-A as well. So the Sierra's will be better for that. It looks like I might not be able to order multiple sets of speakers at one time to A/B. But I do plan on ordering one at a time, and sending them back to order another set from a different company. I think I'll order the Emo's first (6.3 L, C, R). Then the 340se's, then the Sierra's. Maybe the Emo 6.2 LCR too, just to make sure. So it'll be a good 3 or 4 months worth of testing. Since I'm not doing a direct A/B comparison, I'll keep detailed notes on each setup, and then compare the likes and dislikes in the end. I think this is the best way for me to get the right set, since I probably won't be able to order them at the same time. I'll keep you posted in the next few months. Thanks for all the help fellas. I had the 340's a few years back. While they were nice, they just didn't do anything for me. When pushed hard, they were overly bright. But at moderate levels they were fine. It's hard to describe, but they seemed to lack a combination of finesse and weight...That's the best way I can describe them. My Emo 6.2's are more articulate, fuller, and can play loud without compression or distortion...although any speaker will have its limits.
|
|
chas
Minor Hero
Posts: 58
|
Post by chas on Feb 26, 2010 19:31:00 GMT -5
I had the 340's a few years back. While they were nice, they just didn't do anything for me. When pushed hard, they were overly bright. But at moderate levels they were fine. It's hard to describe, but they seemed to lack a combination of finesse and weight...That's the best way I can describe them. My Emo 6.2's are more articulate, fuller, and can play loud without compression or distortion...although any speaker will have its limits. Do you remember if your 340's were classics or SE's?
|
|