|
|
Post by Wideawake on Jul 19, 2011 11:05:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Wall on Jul 19, 2011 11:26:07 GMT -5
Lol, exactly ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by vincedog3 on Jul 19, 2011 20:55:37 GMT -5
I find that using video cables allows me to "see" my music  . By in large you should not have any problems using component video cables for audio. Yeah but those cables when played previously on situation comedies make my music sound funny.  ;D   ;D |
|
|
|
Post by dbster on Dec 16, 2011 19:37:26 GMT -5
At the relatively low frequency of audio signals - usefully 20 KHz and lower, the cable impedance (such as 75 ohms often used in video) is less of an issue. I would still use the same length and type of cable for each channel. So, as an earlier post here said, using video cable for audio is acceptable; using audio cable for video isn't. And just like any cables, you may hear a difference between different cables in the signal path.That is, some perceive a difference between various types of audio cable, so some may perceive a difference between various video cables used for audio. If you subscribe to the theory of cables that cost as much as Emotiva equipment, then I wouldn't substitute.
Summary:
1) Again, same type and length per channel for any cabling.
2) Shielding is the biggest issue in low level signal cables
|
|
;D 
