ukemo
Seeker Of Truth
Posts: 6
|
Post by ukemo on Jun 28, 2011 12:59:17 GMT -5
Hi, I currently use a Denon 2809 AVR but am planning on getting an Emo amp as a power amp to run my Monitor Audio RS6 5.1AV surround setup. Need some advice regarding which amp to go for and whether to biamp or not. Option 1Denon + XPA-3Use the Denon AVR to power the rear channels and use the Emo to power the 3 front speakers. Option 2XPA-5Use XPA-5 to run all speakers Option 3Denon + XPA-5Use the Denon to power the rears and then use one channel of the XPA-5 for the centre and the other 4 channels to biamp the front Left and Right speakers. The Denon AVR is 7.1 but I only have a 5.1 setup so I am currently biamping the front Left and Right speakers. I kind of like this setup, plus my Chord cables are constructed for biamping so I would need new cables if I didn't biamp the with the XPA-5. The front speakers are rated at 110W so I am a little worried that biamping them with the XPA-5 may be too much power and could fry the speakers, or make them sound too create a harsh. If I go for the XPA-5 I probably would go for Option 3 and biamp the fronts, as long as someone can advise whether this is a good idea or not.... Any thoughts would be much appreciated . For info, system is used equally for movies and music, as well as SACD and DVD-As. Music is varied but mostly hard rock, but UK-style garage also, so some bass in there too. Cheers
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2011 13:42:33 GMT -5
Option 2 or 1 Only true biamping with active crossovers is beneficial. Does the Denon have an active crossover built in or are you planning to purchase one?
|
|
|
Post by jtsherri on Jun 28, 2011 15:01:57 GMT -5
I was bi-amping my Monitor Audio RS8s & RSLCR (center channel) with (2) UPA-5s and using the remaining 4 channels for the surrounds & rears.
As of a couple of days ago I decided to switch things up a bit, as I didn't really notice a significant difference through bi-amping. I've since sold my UMC-1, both UPA-5s, and the Dayton SA1000s powering my subs. The plan is to pick up a Denon AVR-4311CI or Onkyo TX-NR3008 (or possibly the 5008) and a used 200W-300W x 7 amp in addition to the two XPA-1s I picked up to replace my sub amps. I suspect these changes will make a MUCH bigger difference than bi-amping did.
EDIT: I agree with Theresa, by the way - option 1 or 2 all the way.
|
|
|
Post by slbenz on Jun 29, 2011 1:27:42 GMT -5
I would probably go with either Options 1 or 2. After checking the owner's manual for your AVR, it doesn't look like it can be set up for active biamping. Unless the feature is available and I missed it.
|
|
ukemo
Seeker Of Truth
Posts: 6
|
Post by ukemo on Nov 28, 2012 14:36:32 GMT -5
An old thread I know, however, I haven't purchased the XPA-5 yet but am planning to do so in the next few weeks so still need some advice please.
My speaker cables for the front left and right cost me quite a bit and are terminated with 4 plugs on each end as I got them for bi-amping the front left and right. Ideally I can reuse these rather than getting a new set made up.
So regardless of whether bi-amping in this way is true bi-amping or not, would using two channels of an XPA-5 into the left and two channels into the right be okay for the amp and the speakers - i.e. could this overload the speakers (Monitor Audio RS6 rated at 110W). (The remaining channel would go into the centre speaker.)
I know improvements may not be heard but would it be okay.
Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by jackfish on Nov 28, 2012 15:17:06 GMT -5
Yes.
|
|