Post by Boomzilla on Aug 4, 2012 20:49:26 GMT -5
I'll break this down into two separate reviews. The first consideration will be of the UMC-1 as a home theater preamp, the second as a stereo preamp.
Permutations that my system has gone through since the UMC-1 arrived include the following:
Static elements:
Variable elements:
HOME THEATER PREAMP REVIEW:
Some things about the UMC-1 impress me greatly. Among those are:
Some things about the UMC-1 displease me greatly. Among those are:
After trying various configurations (5.1 - 4.1 - 3.1 - 2.1 - and 2.0), I've decided that in my living room, the 2.0 configuration works best. The surrounds, despite having a wireless interface, must reside flush with the back wall (where the listening couch is). They added insufficient drama to the type of movies that I most often watch to justify their complication. I'm a "simpler is better" type, generally.
The center channel, although adding a better intelligibility factor to movie dialogue, again may not justify its additional complication.
The subwoofer proved unnecessary with the Polk towers (that had their own internal powered subwoofers) and with the Theils (which go down to the 30s without needing a sub). The Klipsch copies, I chose not to leave in the system, and although they really needed the underpinning of the subwoofer, it became academic once they were sold.
I am not yet started in listening to the UMC-1 as a stereo preamp, but will post additional comments in this thread once I do so.
So far, I'm satisfied for the price paid vs. the performance I receive for the UMC-1. I still wonder, however, if I should have just bought an AV receiver with 7.1 preamp outputs and used the internal amps for the center and surrounds. The quality of the UMC-1 as a stereo preamp will determine that answer.
Permutations that my system has gone through since the UMC-1 arrived include the following:
Static elements:
- Home Theater source = Oppo BDP-93 with internet connection via ethernet & used for DVDs, Blu-Rays, and occasional CDs.
- Preamp = UMC-1 with latest bios upgrade
- Power amp (front R & L) = Emotiva XPA-2
Variable elements:
- Main speakers = Polk tower models with built-in powered subwoofers, Thiel 3.6 speakers, 3-way horn-loaded speakers in the style of Klipsch Heresies
- Center channel speakers = Definitive Technology LCR, Polk center channel
- Center channel amp = Crown PS-400
- Surround speakers = Polk di/bi-polars
- Surround amplifiers = KEF wireless amps
- Subwoofer = Polk 10"
- Wires (for those who care) = Kimber copycats for front R/L, Monster Cable original for front R/L, Nordost flat wire for front R/L, Radio Shack 12 ga. zip cord for center & surrounds. Interconnects included Monster, some kind of weirdo-wire from the 90's, and some kind of Audioquest stuff.
HOME THEATER PREAMP REVIEW:
Some things about the UMC-1 impress me greatly. Among those are:
- The ability to detect speakers, phase them, and equalize them to the room via Emo-Q.
- The clarity and lack of distortion on well-recorded sound tracks.
- The cool and informative front panel display.
Some things about the UMC-1 displease me greatly. Among those are:
- The five minutes of "handshaking" between the Oppo and the UMC-1 before both the video and audio could sort themselves out for Blu-Ray discs. Thanks to coaching by some here on the lounge, this has largely been ameliorated via use of both HDMI outputs (bypassing the UMC-1 entirely for video).
- Occasional miscues as to the type of audio encoding on some DVDs leading to distortion in the center channel.
- The lack of a "high compression" mode to squash dynamic range for movie viewing when I don't want to wake the family
After trying various configurations (5.1 - 4.1 - 3.1 - 2.1 - and 2.0), I've decided that in my living room, the 2.0 configuration works best. The surrounds, despite having a wireless interface, must reside flush with the back wall (where the listening couch is). They added insufficient drama to the type of movies that I most often watch to justify their complication. I'm a "simpler is better" type, generally.
The center channel, although adding a better intelligibility factor to movie dialogue, again may not justify its additional complication.
The subwoofer proved unnecessary with the Polk towers (that had their own internal powered subwoofers) and with the Theils (which go down to the 30s without needing a sub). The Klipsch copies, I chose not to leave in the system, and although they really needed the underpinning of the subwoofer, it became academic once they were sold.
I am not yet started in listening to the UMC-1 as a stereo preamp, but will post additional comments in this thread once I do so.
So far, I'm satisfied for the price paid vs. the performance I receive for the UMC-1. I still wonder, however, if I should have just bought an AV receiver with 7.1 preamp outputs and used the internal amps for the center and surrounds. The quality of the UMC-1 as a stereo preamp will determine that answer.