Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Remotes
Mar 27, 2013 6:54:34 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2013 6:54:34 GMT -5
ArthutZ, your post *definitely* causes a horizontal scroll on the 1st page of this multi-page thread. The 2nd page does not need a scroll since the image is not embedded in it. I'm running 1920x1280 on a 23" monitor. It's not the end of the world, but it is an annoyance...
-RW-
|
|
|
Remotes
Mar 27, 2013 7:46:49 GMT -5
Post by chaosrv on Mar 27, 2013 7:46:49 GMT -5
I didn't need to scroll horizontally using Chrome on my 27" iMac...maybe it is an issue with browser rendering rather than how the pictures were posted.
|
|
|
Remotes
Mar 27, 2013 13:07:17 GMT -5
Post by GreenKiwi on Mar 27, 2013 13:07:17 GMT -5
Posting to a forum should not be web development. If browser differences exist, it's a fcuking proboards issue, not mine. I would have to totally agree here. It is Proboards job to present the pages nicely. images should get styled appropriately so that they don't cause issues. @calvinhobbes - if it bothers you, it is probably worth reporting this problem support.proboards.com/
|
|
|
Remotes
Mar 28, 2013 7:00:47 GMT -5
Post by calvinhobbe on Mar 28, 2013 7:00:47 GMT -5
1920 x 1280 resolution at 100% on a 27" monitor...have you looked at your actual post to see what it ended up looking like?? Shockingly enough, since apparently I haven't been clear, YES. A window far smaller and humbler than yours. Half of a 27" screen (the left half). I've also clearly reported it worked on the iPad and another person even confirmed it didn't look unusual on his phone. If you want to be helpful, please state your platform. Like I said, I'm sorry for the inconvenience, but I refuse to admit I did anything wrong. Posting to a forum should not be web development. If browser differences exist, it's a fcuking proboards issue, not mine. A little touchy aren't you. Windows 7 Enterprise, IE9 and a huge monitor...and you will note that I am not the only one who had to scroll. I also tried it on another platform here, a Mac with Snow Leopard, Chrome and a 24" monitor with the same results. It is a courtesy and many forums limit the size of your images in order to avoid these issues, but I don't believe there is any rules here on images as they expect people to be polite.
|
|
|
Remotes
Mar 28, 2013 12:42:38 GMT -5
Post by chaosrv on Mar 28, 2013 12:42:38 GMT -5
Sooo...how about them (insert favorite sports team here)?
|
|
|
Remotes
Mar 28, 2013 13:04:18 GMT -5
Post by arthurz on Mar 28, 2013 13:04:18 GMT -5
Dude, they're AWESOME! Clearly superior to (their main rival). Cheers
|
|
|
Post by GreenKiwi on Mar 28, 2013 13:44:13 GMT -5
I hope the mods clear out the junk, and or we simply create a new thread to have a good discussion about remotes. This one started out so well.
|
|
|
Remotes
Mar 28, 2013 16:06:24 GMT -5
Post by flamingeye on Mar 28, 2013 16:06:24 GMT -5
I’d like a remote that worked with facial expressions
|
|
|
Remotes
Mar 28, 2013 16:50:52 GMT -5
Post by chaosrv on Mar 28, 2013 16:50:52 GMT -5
My girlfriend uses facial expressions all the time and somehow the volume/channel changes without her having to do anything else.
|
|
|
Remotes
Mar 29, 2013 10:59:07 GMT -5
Post by flamingeye on Mar 29, 2013 10:59:07 GMT -5
^ thank's for showing me that spelling error so discretely
|
|