|
|
Post by arthurz on Apr 10, 2013 15:14:19 GMT -5
|
|
bootman
Emo VIPs 
Typing useless posts on internet forums....
Posts: 9,358
|
Post by bootman on Apr 10, 2013 15:16:42 GMT -5
That's all?   lol. |
|
|
|
Post by arthurz on Apr 10, 2013 15:19:11 GMT -5
Think of it as 2.7 horsepower  . I think it's approximately the same as some of the Japanese cars from the '70s. |
|
|
|
Post by mg on Apr 10, 2013 15:28:46 GMT -5
Arthurz,
Did you just say the XPR-1 hit 2,700 watts in 4ohms..
|
|
|
|
Post by arthurz on Apr 10, 2013 15:30:20 GMT -5
2.7 horsepower . The AH number was 2.0 kW at 0.1% THD+N (that's what the 2.7 hp corresponds to). The 2.859 kW from the chart is unclear to me. Their post says "Here is a screenshot of CEA 2006 Peak power, 4 ohms; which simulates music program material." |
|
|
|
Post by GreenKiwi on Apr 10, 2013 16:31:33 GMT -5
*Lights dimming*
|
|
|
|
Post by garbulky on Apr 10, 2013 16:47:20 GMT -5
It's peak power. Not RMS. And that is indeed 2859 watts! Booya. Two of those to pump 5700 watts out in stereo on peaks. Fully balanced stereo on peaks...I mean. Edit: some guy asked "that's great but does it sound good?" to which audioholics replied "No it sounds terrible... " Lol. Gotta love the humor. Some jokes on load banks are needed here..... |
|
lol.
. I think it's approximately the same as some of the Japanese cars from the '70s.
