musicguru
Minor Hero
What do you think? Fusion 8100/ 2 XPA-1L vs UMC 200/ XPA 5 gen 2
Posts: 25 
|
Post by musicguru on Oct 30, 2014 22:10:11 GMT -5
Hi, I hesitate to choose between UMC 200/UPA 700 or Fusion 8100/XPA 200 for 7.1 HT set-up. My listenning is 80% of HT and 20% of Music. As you look at the price is $110 more if you choose UMC 200/UPA 700 combo than Fusion 8100/XPA 200. Any suggestions are very appriciated. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by yeeeha17 on Oct 30, 2014 23:24:15 GMT -5
I would go umc200/upa700 route because you can always change the processor and still have the amp later
|
|
|
|
Post by memotiva on Nov 7, 2014 10:42:24 GMT -5
To retort, though, the Fusion is cheaper than just the UMC-200 and is largely a UMC200/UPA700 in a box. It's only slightly less powered than the UPA700. I've read here, and it may not still be the case, that the product has issues with long HDMI cables so that might be an issue to evaluate.
Why would you need an XPA-200? The power per channel of both solution is about the same so why an XPA-200 on one?
|
|
