|
|
Post by viperz40 on Mar 8, 2016 19:59:47 GMT -5
I can say this since I have owned JBL L100s back in the late 70's.I second buy better speakers I know speakers are entirely subjective, what do you define as better? |
|
|
|
Post by vneal on Mar 9, 2016 8:47:34 GMT -5
I can say this since I have owned JBL L100s back in the late 70's.I second buy better speakers I know speakers are entirely subjective, what do you define as better? There have been design involvements over the last 40 years since the JBL L100 was sold. Namely better cabinet construction, line array designed speakers , improved woofer and tweeter performance. Find a dealer that will let you demo speakers in your home. I think you will be surprised Your upstream electronics are good. In fact VERY GOOD. I think the biggest improvement you would hear would be imaging and clarity on the highs |
|
|
|
Post by rbk123 on Mar 9, 2016 9:48:58 GMT -5
I guess I should clarify I am using the XPR-2's with B&W CM 10'S. would the XPA-1 make much of a difference? What we're trying to say is there may be a difference, could be worse/could be better, but if there is a difference that difference will be very small -> especially for the $$ it will cost you. Speakers make the biggest difference in a setup so you are better off using the $$ and getting better speakers. Not implying your current speakers are bad, rather speakers are where you are better off spending a chunk of change since the XPR-2 (as are XPA-1's) is very close to the top of the heap performance-wise. |
|
