Post by klinemj on Feb 18, 2020 13:26:54 GMT -5
Well....because the resistance of the jumper is negligible compared to the resistance of the speaker wires it ensures that each two wires will act exactly like one fatter wire.
(Without the jumper in place exactly what happens will depend on how the speakers are wired internally.)
(And, yes, with 10 gauge wires, each six foot long, and the amount of current involved in running speakers, any difference whatsoever is going to be really really tiny.)
Note that the idea that "current takes the path of least resistance" is sort of an oversimplification.
For two resistances with the same voltage across them - current flow in each will be inversely proportional to the resistance.
(Each pair of wires is electrically two really low value resistors in parallel.)
So, if you have two paths of almost equal resistance, the current will be divided almost equally between them, with slightly more than half following the path of lower resistance.
(So, in this case, the current will be divided equally between the two wires...)
I'll also point out a "hidden down-side" of both bi-amping and bi-wiring...
By adding more wires, and more connections, you are increasing the ways in which something can come loose, short to something else, or simply get hooked up wrong.
Yeah - that makes sense thinking of it that way. I didn't see your drawing at first...didn't show up. That makes it clear.
The jumper, though, doesn't seem to add any value over not having it - other than being a cool conversation piece.
Mark
Nice picking at nits...
As for things going wrong with loose or shorted or incorrectly hooked up connections...blasphemy. That NEVER happens to me (at least today).
Mark