|
|
Post by ricardojoa on Jan 31, 2010 10:55:59 GMT -5
I was wondering if i can use the XPA3 as a two channels because i am looking for 200 watts x 2 and emo doesnt have any 200 watts two channels and the xpa2 is a little overboard.
I could consider the UPA1 but for now just wondering about the xpa3 for two channel.
thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by sanjaygolf on Jan 31, 2010 13:52:39 GMT -5
The XPA-3 should be fine for 2 channel. Do you already have one? If not, I would consider getting two UPA-1s if your rig was purely 2 ch. The UPA-1s would be better for 2 channel. But if you were later going to integrate this system into a HT setup then it might be better to get the XPA-3 for the front 3 and then a UPA-2 for surrounds. Either way you'll have a good setup.
|
|
|
|
Post by sharkman on Feb 1, 2010 0:27:56 GMT -5
I'm running the XPA-3 with only two channels with no problems. Once in a while I plan to rotate the spare channel in so the electronics get broken in, but that's just me. I was in the same boat as you, wanted 200 watts and the UPA-1 wasn't on the horizon yet. It might be a while yet too, it depends on your time frame.
|
|
|
|
Post by wowfactor on Feb 1, 2010 10:00:16 GMT -5
If you do not already have the XPA-3 then I would definitely opt for 2 UPA-1's instead! This would give you the sonic benifit of Mono Blocks and the 200 watts per channel you are looking for. Yeah, Mono Blocks.... That's it...  |
|
