|
|
Post by airballwall on Feb 10, 2010 9:46:17 GMT -5
I was wondering what most people think about the Emo-Q calibration system. How does it compare to Audyssey? I read a thread where a few people seemed to not like Emo-Q at all. I'm just wondering, now that more people are getting their hands on the UMC-1, if their opinions are changing. Any good experiences out there?
|
|
ntrain42
Emo VIPs 
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be home before breakfast!
Posts: 2,969
|
Post by ntrain42 on Feb 10, 2010 10:37:34 GMT -5
Personally I think its a very well setup design(Not the auto function, as IMO all autofuctions are poor at best)with a very flexible xover,time alignment(speaker distance) and independant channel parametric EQ function. 3 user presets is great as well.
All HT processors should have this level of flexibility, most dont.
|
|
ratmice
Emo VIPs
I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV.
Posts: 1,853
|
Post by ratmice on Feb 10, 2010 10:47:31 GMT -5
Yet a third EMO-Q thread this am. Great!
|
|
NorthStar
Seeker Of Truth
"And it stoned me to my soul" - Van Morrison
Posts: 0
|
Post by NorthStar on Feb 11, 2010 23:58:10 GMT -5
Personally I think its a very well setup design(Not the auto function, as IMO all autofuctions are poor at best)with a very flexible xover,time alignment(speaker distance) and independant channel parametric EQ function. 3 user presets is great as well. All HT processors should have this level of flexibility, most dont. Parametric EQ? |
|
|
|
Post by RayoVac on Feb 12, 2010 0:11:33 GMT -5
Yet a third EMO-Q thread this am. Great! We could not possibly have just ONE thread on the same topic, that would be silly.  |
|
NorthStar
Seeker Of Truth
"And it stoned me to my soul" - Van Morrison
Posts: 0
|
Post by NorthStar on Feb 12, 2010 22:06:24 GMT -5
I tought it was a Graphic EQ with eleven bands?
|
|
