|
|
Post by aboroth00 on May 15, 2010 17:16:44 GMT -5
Don't forget: 1. the microphone (sold separately) 2. The microphone pre-amp (sold separately) Add those up and it's quite a bit more than 100.00 The mic and preamp would probably run you at least another $100 plus the shipping on everything. For $359 you can get the Velodyne SMS-1 from Amazon/Vanns with free shipping and get something that is easier to use with an on-screen graph. True, but with a mic, you can correct the whole freq response including highs. I believe the SMS-1 only goes up to 300hz. As we all know with the UMC-1, the EMO-q is too erratic to use. |
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis.ie on May 16, 2010 6:13:34 GMT -5
A Mic & Pre-amp aren't really required for tuning with the Behringer EQs. A simple $20 radio shack spl meter with the calibration file & REW is all thats needed. I'll be getting the FBQ2496 shortly to use for sub eq as its got better specs than the DSP1124P. One of the comments in the link that was posted was the 2496 had less bands in the sub region - that said, if you need mroe than 4 or 5 I think there are bigger problems in the room.  |
|
|
|
Post by Stevens on May 16, 2010 6:49:56 GMT -5
Why don't you guys simply adopt Audyssey with their FIR filters? Or ARC for that matter with a combination of FIR & IIR filters? ...TRINNOV?  * These beat any Graphic or Parametric EQs that I know of. Besides, the most important place to EQ is in the low frequencies (below 200 Hz or so). And Audyssey has a separate EQ for that, and good for two subs too. ...Frequency, phase & time domain compensated for. No way with a Graphic EQ, and no way either with a Parametric EQ and it's Q. And you need sophisticated measuring instruments to properly calibrate these rather older EQ systems. We now live in a much more advanced world. Just sayin'. +1 I just posted this, in another thread: link |
|
