|
|
Post by CiXel on May 5, 2008 18:40:02 GMT -5
Halcro MC70 "Full control via RS 232 or ETHERNET connection" Wow a power amp controllable by RS 232 or Ethernet? I'm in!  |
|
bootman
Emo VIPs 
Typing useless posts on internet forums....
Posts: 9,358
|
Post by bootman on Jun 18, 2008 17:09:40 GMT -5
Halcro MC70 "Full control via RS 232 or ETHERNET connection" Wow a power amp controllable by RS 232 or Ethernet? I'm in! For $7K I'm not!  |
|
DYohn
Emo VIPs
Posts: 18,486
|
Post by DYohn on Jun 18, 2008 17:37:23 GMT -5
Halcro MC70 "Full control via RS 232 or ETHERNET connection" Wow a power amp controllable by RS 232 or Ethernet? I'm in! For $7K I'm not! As an owner of the MC20 (and DM8 preamp) for my stereo setup, you get a lot more than just RS232 control... but Halcro is overpriced. |
|
|
|
Post by stc4life on Jul 4, 2008 17:39:00 GMT -5
Hello,
This is my first post. I have been looking to replace my 11 year old Pioneer Elite receiver and had planned to get one the new Elites, but after briefly researching the new UMC-1, I decided that separates were the way to go.
I am on the UMC-1 waitlist, and am trying to decide what amp to get. I really should have pulled the trigger on the LPA-1, but was still deciding whether to go for separates or keep my previous plan. I have a 3.2 set-up now with Klipsch KSP-300s and a KSP-C6. Obviously I could go for the UPA-7, but I don't ever foresee being able to do a 7 channel set-up. I am interested by the idea of two BPA-1s, but who knows if I could find any. Also, would it be a problem to only use one channel on one of them? Or should I just bridge that one? Also, I am intrigued by the DZA-1, but I cannot find any information on it besides what is in the great table at the top of the thread. Do we know anything more about these or an expected availability date?
Thanks for any help in advance.
|
|
a2058
Emo VIPs
Posts: 260
|
Post by a2058 on Jul 4, 2008 17:49:53 GMT -5
I would check to see if a B-stock LPA-1 is available. These will be significantly less than the UPA7 (or a new LPA-1), if they are still around. If you only use a few channels of the LPA-1, I think it balances the load somewhat and you may get a slightly better wattage output than driving all 7 channels at once, check with Lonnie about this though...
|
|
|
|
Post by stc4life on Jul 7, 2008 8:16:13 GMT -5
Thanks for the advice. I ended up being able to get an LPA-1, so now I am just waiting for the UMC-1.
|
|
|
|
Post by sbavnut on Jul 21, 2008 15:35:35 GMT -5
Dann/Lonnie:
(Apology in advance if this info was posted somewhere earlier)
Can you guys please post the following info for the XPA-2 thru 5 amps...
1. Crosstalk numbers.
2. Voltage gain (is it the same 32db for both the RCA and XLR connectors?)
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by nikmlfan on Jul 28, 2008 0:36:48 GMT -5
Doug-
Think its time to update original- noticed that specs aren't there for the XPA-3 (yes, I know they are online) but would be nice to have in one place- or if you would like to send me a copy of the original, I will do it and send it back to you so it can be updated!
Nik
|
|
|
|
Post by doug917 on Jul 28, 2008 12:38:37 GMT -5
I don't have access to the file from work...I will try to update tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by doug917 on Jul 28, 2008 20:37:13 GMT -5
I updated the XPA-3 and the UPA-7.
|
|
|
|
Post by dgsmith2009 on Aug 19, 2008 12:10:26 GMT -5
Any chance of getting the amp section of the DRM-1 added? Or if it is avalible already please point me?
|
|
|
|
Post by doug917 on Aug 19, 2008 15:27:57 GMT -5
I probably won't get this on there as I don't have the details and the units are no longer in production.
|
|
|
|
Post by CiXel on Aug 19, 2008 18:12:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by doug917 on Aug 19, 2008 18:38:31 GMT -5
I have added a "Gain Structure" row on the 2nd Generation spreadsheet and put in the number for the MPS-2. I also assume this is the gain for the 200W module and not the 2-channel module which I assume to be lower. The width has to be ~ 17" as the MPS-2 does not have the piano glossed wooden side panels like the MPS-1 does, making the MPS-1 wider. I also removed the DZA-1 as it doesn't look like it made the cut and replaced it with the UPA-2. |
|
|
|
Post by jimb on Aug 19, 2008 22:33:21 GMT -5
I have added a "Gain Structure" row on the 2nd Generation spreadsheet and put in the number for the MPS-2. I also assume this is the gain for the 200W module and not the 2-channel module which I assume to be lower. I was concerned about this when I had both and was assured that the gain structure is the same for both the EPM-300 and EPM-2150 modules. |
|
|
|
Post by snapper on Sept 1, 2008 1:01:33 GMT -5
Can someone please confirm the actual depth of the IPS-1. The manual indicates it is 16", the comparison chart lists it at 17 1/2", and the webpage (http://www.emotiva.com/ips1.html_) shows it as 16 7/16". This is very important to me because if it is not less than 17" including binding posts, it won't be suitable for me. My space limitation rules out all of the current models, so my fingers are crossed.
|
|
|
|
Post by flamingeye on Sept 1, 2008 10:28:00 GMT -5
I have the IPS & its 16" deep add another inch for the speaker posts
|
|
glen
Emo VIPs
Slug-Man Rules
Posts: 23
|
Post by glen on Nov 21, 2008 0:07:16 GMT -5
In the PDF, under "Dimensions", the spelling of height is "heigth".
|
|
Eskimo
Emo VIPs
Got 18's?
Posts: 399
|
Post by Eskimo on Nov 21, 2008 15:23:35 GMT -5
In the PDF, under "Dimensions", the spelling of height is "heigth". "Any variations is spelling are a natural by-product of this hand-made, audiophile-grade message board, and should not be construed as a defect" ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis.ie on Jan 8, 2009 12:57:20 GMT -5
 Dare I mention it says "Dampening" instead of "Damping" too ... or is there a new water-adding feature included now? ;D
|
|
