|
|
Post by malibujeff on Dec 31, 2012 22:18:02 GMT -5
OK, here's another one of those cool little features that you don't have to turn on; it's just part of how the UMC-200 works. Let's say you're listening to the big game on the radio, and you want to see the TV footage, but you'd still prefer to listen to your favorite radio commentator.... On the UMC-200, if you're watching (and listening to) a video source (like Cable), and you switch to another source that is audio-only, the video from your previous choice will continue to play (instead of a blank screen). In my example, you could put on the Cable coverage of the game, then switch to the radio, and the Cable video will keep playing. This is also great if you have some cool mood videos (woods, or waterfalls, or whatever); you can leave them on the screen while you listen to your favorite music. Or, let's say you're waiting for the game to come on.... You can leave the video for the sports channel on-screen and listen to music while keeping an eye out for the game to start. Then, when the game starts, re-select that input to switch back to the audio that goes with the game. This is great! Thanks for including it. Makes me glad that I placed my order last week for a UMC-200 and a UPA-700 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2013 17:18:00 GMT -5
Does the UMC-200 have the all channels stereo ( 7.1 channels stereo ) feature for playing 2 channel source into loud party music, like many receivers have it? The UMC-1 doesn't have it and it's a missing feature for me and I think for many other peoples. Yes it does have the "All Stereo" DSP you are referring. I'm listening to music from the UMC-200 in that mode as I type. Actually the UMC-1 does have an "All Stereo" mode, available when Multi-PCM is being received. I'm still trying to figure out what it does, since it is not mentioned in the manual ;-) My guess is that it does for multi-PCM what "Stereo" does for two-channel input - a.k.a., performs post-processing, especially bass management. |
|
|
|
Post by geebo on Jan 1, 2013 17:52:49 GMT -5
Yes it does have the "All Stereo" DSP you are referring. I'm listening to music from the UMC-200 in that mode as I type. Actually the UMC-1 does have an "All Stereo" mode, available when Multi-PCM is being received. I'm still trying to figure out what it does, since it is not mentioned in the manual ;-) My guess is that it does for multi-PCM what "Stereo" does for two-channel input - a.k.a., performs post-processing, especially bass management. All Stereo Mode in the UMC-1 should really be thought of as Multi Channel Surround. When the UMC receives a multi channel PCM signal, All Stereo will simply direct the individual channels to the appropriate outputs. It will not create a multi channel signal from a stereo source. |
|
|
|
Post by meldhache on Jan 1, 2013 23:43:51 GMT -5
I just wonder if a breaking period (like speakers) is also needed for my new UPC-200 pre-amp.
During my initial setup last week the emo-Q2 was slightly off with it's distance evaluation and in my opinion the Q calibration. I was also hearing intermittent hiss from some of my monitor 11 version 7 paradigm speakers fronts,the center and surrounds.
Today, after taking down my Christmas decorations ( possible interference source) I decided to recalibrate my sub-8 monitor 7 sub with the paradigm perfect bass Q software and to reapply the Emotiva Q2 to my system. Ho and behold the distance were right on and in my opinion perfectly balanced . I could not decipher any hiss in any of my speakers.
Listening to the movie the hunger games, the sound stage seemed perfectly forward and spacious especially the final poursuit scene where I swear the mutts were right Behind me...
Very impressed
Mel
|
|
|
|
Post by stevet on Jan 2, 2013 12:51:49 GMT -5
Anything "cool" about the Zones functionality in the UMC-200? The only thing I can notice about them is that they just plain don't work. That's not "cool" at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by wizardofoz on Jan 2, 2013 12:59:52 GMT -5
Umc-1 had the same video stays when you select an analogue source...tuner too, but the issue when selecting sources on the umc-1 is when you configure it and you select the video it overrides the audio setting... Ie if you select coax for dvd audio then select hdmi3 the audio gets set to hdmi....hope this bug didnt also make it to the umc-200
|
|
|
|
Post by vthokies on Jan 3, 2013 14:06:44 GMT -5
Does anyone know what the preout voltages is for the UMC-200. I'm sure it's over 2 but have not seen the stated specs.
Thanks,
Ted
|
|
|
|
Post by bolle on Jan 4, 2013 12:06:19 GMT -5
One of the reviews on the net mentioned about 4V.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikoyv on Jan 5, 2013 8:40:59 GMT -5
I'm just nit picking about the port placements. I know you can disregard the labels but why not match the UPA amp labels. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by bolle on Jan 5, 2013 12:24:59 GMT -5
Yes this is slightly annoying. Doesn´t match my Sherwood either...
|
|
|
|
Post by sleepjeep on Jan 5, 2013 15:27:26 GMT -5
I agree having the outputs on the umc reversed from the inputs UPA really messes with my OCD. Never having a HTR preamp before are they all like that?
|
|
hemster
Global Moderator 
Particle Manufacturer
...still listening... still watching
Posts: 51,952
|
Post by hemster on Jan 5, 2013 16:56:03 GMT -5
Yes it would be nice if the inputs/outputs and labels were matched (OCD here too!) but given that the back panels are usually out of sight, it doesn't really matter, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
Post by AudioHTIT on Jan 5, 2013 21:31:01 GMT -5
I'm just nit picking about the port placements. I know you can disregard the labels but why not match the UPA amp labels. I agree - bugs me too, it's a rookie mistake (not a design decision), the left / right outputs are also reversed. The XSP-1 has the same problem, they were designed as if you would face the rears to the front. |
|
|
|
Post by me262 on Jan 6, 2013 0:42:53 GMT -5
I'm just nit picking about the port placements. I know you can disregard the labels but why not match the UPA amp labels. Haha I am not going to lie I had the exact same thought when I hooked this up to the amp...I was like wow they could not have made this worst...then I just switched the speaker terminals and hooked it up with crossing, not a big deal just funny someone else notices it. |
|
bootman
Emo VIPs 
Typing useless posts on internet forums....
Posts: 9,358
|
Post by bootman on Jan 6, 2013 17:55:19 GMT -5
I think the issue is the amp labels.
IMO they are just a dumb idea.
I just line up the inputs and outputs as they lay out.
|
|
Pauly
Emo VIPs
Posts: 5,237
|
Post by Pauly on Jan 6, 2013 18:06:45 GMT -5
I think the issue is the amp labels. IMO they are just a dumb idea. I just line up the inputs and outputs as they lay out. Yep, that's the only problem. Take away the labels and there is no problem. Unless it's an amp like the LPA-1 where two of the channels have less power. In that case labels make sense. |
|
|
|
Post by AudioHTIT on Jan 6, 2013 18:54:06 GMT -5
The problem is when two recent components like the XDA-2 and the XSP-1 don't even use the same scheme. Sure you can rationalize that it doesn't matter or doesn't affect the sound, but if we don't point out mistakes they will continue to happen. In my opinion standards should be followed, and it's free.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikoyv on Jan 7, 2013 13:14:19 GMT -5
The problem is when two recent components like the XDA-2 and the XSP-1 don't even use the same scheme. Sure you can rationalize that it doesn't matter or doesn't affect the sound, but if we don't point out mistakes they will continue to happen. In my opinion standards should be followed, and it's free. Thanks guys for your reply. Good to know its not just me and my OCD  the subwooder output not being lined up to the xlr subwoofer out is just odd. maybe its more convenient from a schematic design and cost. On a different topic, CES 2013 is out and 4K display seems to be the next big thing. Will UMC-200 support it? is this something that can be added later on through software? This is the only thing that I want to make sure before I purchase. |
|
|
|
Post by AudioHTIT on Jan 7, 2013 16:24:05 GMT -5
The XMC-1 specifically mentions 4K passthrough, I could find no mention on the UMC-200 page but they are purported to have the same HDMI boards (or at least similar). I would expect then the UMC-200 might pass a 4K/UHD signal but if it's really important you should call Emo. IMO it's too early to be worrying about 4K, especially in this price range.
|
|
|
|
Post by cwt on Jan 7, 2013 22:51:59 GMT -5
On a different topic, CES 2013 is out and 4K display seems to be the next big thing. Will UMC-200 support it? is this something that can be added later on through software? This is the only thing that I want to make sure before I purchase. Many moons before 4k material turns up mikoyv but the certified umc200 should pass both 4k varieties according to hdmi.org www.hdmi.org/manufacturer/hdmi_1_4/hdmi_1_4_faq.aspx |
|
the subwooder output not being lined up to the xlr subwoofer out is just odd. maybe its more convenient from a schematic design and cost. 
