|
|
Post by Bonzo on Aug 3, 2016 11:23:08 GMT -5
Gotta love a forum when even the moderator s don't read what was said completely (or ignore it), take things out of context, then revert to "smartassism" for a reply. You said "moderator s". Gotta love loungers that generalize!  See, now that's funny.  Please forgive me.   |
|
|
|
Post by Axis on Aug 3, 2016 11:25:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Bonzo on Aug 3, 2016 11:27:00 GMT -5
Nope, you do not use one of these  when trying to be funny. OKkkkk please outline the definition of each for me, cause I must have missed that day at smilie face school. 8) Not all of us go full blown with the smilies like you do. I only use the ones we have quickly available. On this forum, with it's limited choices, this one is the closest we have to roll eyes. = Roll eyes, what ever, give me a break, clueless (or something along those lines) Now you've had your lesson for the day Nick.  |
|
|
|
Post by chaosrv on Aug 3, 2016 11:34:43 GMT -5
I always thought of the as more of a mischievous grin/smirk than eye rolling. |
|
|
|
Post by novisnick on Aug 3, 2016 11:44:21 GMT -5
OKkkkk please outline the definition of each for me, cause I must have missed that day at smilie face school. 8) Not all of us go full blown with the smilies like you do. I only use the ones we have quickly available. On this forum, with it's limited choices, this one is the closest we have to roll eyes. = Roll eyes, what ever, give me a break, clueless (or something along those lines) Now you've had your lesson for the day Nick. I have instant access to 30 unique smilie faces on this forum, available in the dropdown. That one looks like a snicker snicker to me,,,,,,,,so now please define the rest of them for me, since your in a teaching mood!     , heres the first ten. |
|
|
|
Post by Bonzo on Aug 3, 2016 11:49:09 GMT -5
Not all of us go full blown with the smilies like you do. I only use the ones we have quickly available. On this forum, with it's limited choices, this one is the closest we have to roll eyes. = Roll eyes, what ever, give me a break, clueless (or something along those lines) Now you've had your lesson for the day Nick. I have instant access to 30 unique smilie faces on this forum, available in the dropdown. That one looks like a snicker snicker to me,,,,,,,,so now please define the rest of them for me, since your in a teaching mood! , heres the first ten.Sorry, not enough time. |
|
|
|
Post by drtrey3 on Aug 3, 2016 11:59:56 GMT -5
Half way through the Hitchcock thriller Frenzy. My daughter and I are enjoying it, a rough rape scene, occasional nudity which was part of the story so far as I could see it, and moments of classic Hitchcock. Will be interesting to watch the last half!
Trey
|
|
LCSeminole
Global Moderator 
Res firma mitescere nescit.
Posts: 20,858
|
Post by LCSeminole on Aug 3, 2016 17:02:08 GMT -5
Your right, I didn't enjoy it every bit as the first two films. It sucked. Gotta love a forum when even the moderators don't read what was said completely (or ignore it), take things out of context, then revert to "smartassism" for a reply. It's called sarcasm and yes I couldn't find a "rolling of the eyes" emoticon so I used what I thought would get my point across. Your statement "but it was certainly not "every bit as good as the first two films."" is stated as factual, when it is anything but factual in a generalizing sense. To you, it obviously wasn't "every bit as good as the first two films, to me, it was. As for taking things out of context, I've already covered that in the last two sentences. If I've taken your words out of context, I apologize, but I don't know how I could have taken a factual statement out of context when you quoted my post which is obviously subjective, especially when I say "I thought", and not "it obviously" as it isn't obvious to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Bonzo on Aug 3, 2016 17:30:34 GMT -5
It's called sarcasm and yes I couldn't find a "rolling of the eyes" emoticon so I used what I thought would get my point across. Your statement "but it was certainly not "every bit as good as the first two films."" is stated as factual, when it is anything but factual in a generalizing sense. To you, it obviously wasn't "every bit as good as the first two films, to me, it was. As for taking things out of context, I've already covered that in the last two sentences. If I've taken your words out of context, I apologize, but I don't know how I could have taken a factual statement out of context when you quoted my post which is obviously subjective, especially when I say "I thought", and not "it obviously" as it isn't obvious to me. I love sarcasm, it's my main type of humor. A rolling the eyes emoticon is not for sarcasm, it's a negative slam. But, why no one in the world has made a definitive sarcasm emoticon or emogie or smilie by now is beyond me. It's so obviously needed, as failing to understand sarcasm in the written world causes more arguments than almost all other things. But, for the record, the best way I've tackled it is to use 2 in sequence, to indicate a wink like "ya know wink wink" followed by a big smile, or laugh. It usually works. Or if you want pure protection, write out the word sarcasm. Bonzo is always 100% right! lcseminole is always 100% wrong! (sarcasm) And another one of those stupid forum things and pathetic society today at large things, that if you don't say IMO or IMHO with everything you say, everyone seems to think you are telling them fact. Like if I say "the color blue looks best", I'd get slammed. But if I say "IMO the color blue looks best", then I'm fine. What are all of us, news reporters? High level scientists? What happened to general opinions? So many people today don't like others to have opinions. It's truly sad how far society has digressed in some areas. But that's another topic. Back on topic a bit, if we were to assign scores of 1 - 10 to the 3 newest Star Treks, mine would look like this. I certainly do not find them all equally as good, IMO. #1 = 9 #2 = 8 #3 = 7 If you'll recall I gave the new Star Wars a 6.5, so I still like this new Star Trek better. Why? Because it is. Because I'm always 100% right, and 100% right = fact. |
|
|
|
Post by novisnick on Aug 3, 2016 17:39:56 GMT -5
It's called sarcasm and yes I couldn't find a "rolling of the eyes" emoticon so I used what I thought would get my point across. Your statement "but it was certainly not "every bit as good as the first two films."" is stated as factual, when it is anything but factual in a generalizing sense. To you, it obviously wasn't "every bit as good as the first two films, to me, it was. As for taking things out of context, I've already covered that in the last two sentences. If I've taken your words out of context, I apologize, but I don't know how I could have taken a factual statement out of context when you quoted my post which is obviously subjective, especially when I say "I thought", and not "it obviously" as it isn't obvious to me. I love sarcasm, it's my main type of humor. A rolling the eyes emoticon is not for sarcasm, it's a negative slam. But, why no one in the world has made a definitive sarcasm emoticon or emogie or smilie by now is beyond me. It's so obviously needed, as failing to understand sarcasm in the written world causes more arguments than almost all other things. But, for the record, the best way I've tackled it is to use 2 in sequence, to indicate a wink like "ya know wink wink" followed by a big smile, or laugh. It usually works. Or if you want pure protection, write out the word sarcasm. Bonzo is always 100% right! lcseminole is always 100% wrong! (sarcasm) And another one of those stupid forum things and pathetic society today at large things, that if you don't say IMO or IMHO with everything you say, everyone seems to think you are telling them fact. Like if I say "the color blue looks best", I'd get slammed. But if I say "IMO the color blue looks best", then I'm fine. What are all of us, news reporters? High level scientists? What happened to general opinions? So many people today don't like others to have opinions. It's truly sad how far society has digressed in some areas. But that's another topic. Back on topic a bit, if we were to assign scores of 1 - 10 to the 3 newest Star Treks, mine would look like this. I certainly do not find them all equally as good, IMO. #1 = 9 #2 = 8 #3 = 7 If you'll recall I gave the new Star Wars a 6.5, so I still like this new Star Trek better. Why? Because it is. Because I'm always 100% right, and 100% right = fact. You know what else is incredible? Why on earth is there IMHO ( in my honest opinion ) well, there it is! If its not you honest opinion, then don't waist our time!!!  IMO, ( in my opinion ) should be more then enough!!,,,,,,,unless you just full of Schiit!! Then I say again,,,,,don't waist my time!! Are you always lying? And just this time you're being H (honest) ? Whats up with that? Wheres the shrug emoticon?  I should step down now! Honestly! |
|
LCSeminole
Global Moderator
Res firma mitescere nescit.
Posts: 20,858
|
Post by LCSeminole on Aug 3, 2016 17:43:20 GMT -5
To get back on topic  |
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Aug 3, 2016 21:39:26 GMT -5
Actually it's not a bad movie just finished watching Thanks |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 7:54:05 GMT -5
[attachment id="23037" thumbnail="1
|
|
|
|
Post by Boomzilla on Aug 5, 2016 15:26:13 GMT -5
Does the first ten minutes of Taylor Vixen's "Sorority House Rules" count?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bonzo on Aug 11, 2016 9:25:49 GMT -5
|
|
LCSeminole
Global Moderator
Res firma mitescere nescit.
Posts: 20,858
|
Post by LCSeminole on Aug 16, 2016 17:58:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Loop 7 on Aug 16, 2016 19:04:09 GMT -5
|
|
LCSeminole
Global Moderator
Res firma mitescere nescit.
Posts: 20,858
|
Post by LCSeminole on Aug 16, 2016 20:20:48 GMT -5
For those interested in watching "The Two Jakes", you really should watch "Chinatown" first.  |
|
|
|
Post by Loop 7 on Aug 16, 2016 20:31:30 GMT -5
For those interested in watching "The Two Jakes", you really should watch "Chinatown" first. For sure. I don't think I would have "gotten" Two Jakes if I hadn't seen Chinatown a few times. |
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Sept 28, 2016 21:45:07 GMT -5
 great movie i would recommend it |
|
when trying to be funny.
IMO, ( in my opinion ) should be more then enough!!,,,,,,,unless you just full of Schiit!! Then I say again,,,,,don't waist my time!! Are you always lying? And just this time you're being H (honest) ? Whats up with that? Wheres the shrug emoticon? 
